Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 23, 2024
Docket04-24-00707-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00707-CR

EX PARTE Danny ACOSTA

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CR4194 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2024

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In 2021, in trial court cause number 2021-CR-4194, Appellant pled guilty to aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon, a felony. Adjudication was deferred and he was placed on

community supervision. Later, Appellant pled true to violating a condition of his community

supervision. The trial court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to confinement in the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division for fifteen years.

Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, and we designated his appeal as 04-23-00341-

CR. On May 11, 2023, by order of the Texas Supreme Court, his appeal was transferred to the

Thirteenth Court of Appeals. It designated his appeal 13-23-00188-CR.

Court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, and Appellant filed a pro se brief. The

Thirteenth Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and its mandate issued on October 25, 2023. 04-24-00707-CR

On September 3, 2024, the Thirteenth Court received Appellant’s letter stating he was

seeking habeas corpus relief in trial court cause number 2021-CR-4194 due to ineffective

assistance of counsel. The Thirteenth Court forwarded Appellant’s notice to this court.

On October 23, 2024, we advised Appellant that this court has “no jurisdiction over post-

conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.” In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); accord TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 11.07, § 3(a); Hoang v. State, 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). “Post-conviction

writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained [and]

made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals.” In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d at 692 (citing

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by

November 22, 2024, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

On November 7, 2024, Appellant filed a response to this court’s order, stating, “After

research the law regarding jurisdiction and reviewing the record filed in this case by the Clerk, the

undersigned cannot show any cause for this Honorable Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter.”

Necessarily, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Van Hoang v. State
872 S.W.2d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-danny-acosta-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.