Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00707-CR
EX PARTE Danny ACOSTA
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CR4194 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2024
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
In 2021, in trial court cause number 2021-CR-4194, Appellant pled guilty to aggravated
assault with a deadly weapon, a felony. Adjudication was deferred and he was placed on
community supervision. Later, Appellant pled true to violating a condition of his community
supervision. The trial court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to confinement in the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division for fifteen years.
Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, and we designated his appeal as 04-23-00341-
CR. On May 11, 2023, by order of the Texas Supreme Court, his appeal was transferred to the
Thirteenth Court of Appeals. It designated his appeal 13-23-00188-CR.
Court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, and Appellant filed a pro se brief. The
Thirteenth Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and its mandate issued on October 25, 2023. 04-24-00707-CR
On September 3, 2024, the Thirteenth Court received Appellant’s letter stating he was
seeking habeas corpus relief in trial court cause number 2021-CR-4194 due to ineffective
assistance of counsel. The Thirteenth Court forwarded Appellant’s notice to this court.
On October 23, 2024, we advised Appellant that this court has “no jurisdiction over post-
conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.” In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (per curiam); accord TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
art. 11.07, § 3(a); Hoang v. State, 872 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). “Post-conviction
writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained [and]
made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals.” In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d at 692 (citing
TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by
November 22, 2024, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
On November 7, 2024, Appellant filed a response to this court’s order, stating, “After
research the law regarding jurisdiction and reviewing the record filed in this case by the Clerk, the
undersigned cannot show any cause for this Honorable Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter.”
Necessarily, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Danny Acosta v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-danny-acosta-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.