Ex Parte Daniels

252 S.W.2d 586, 158 Tex. Crim. 2, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1319
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1952
Docket26084
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 252 S.W.2d 586 (Ex Parte Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Daniels, 252 S.W.2d 586, 158 Tex. Crim. 2, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1319 (Tex. 1952).

Opinion

*3 MORRISON, Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the penitentiary, filed his original application for writ of habeas corpus in this court.

It is shown from the record herein that he was convicted on November 6, 1939, in Cause No. 13,643, in the criminal district court of Jefferson County of felony theft and repetition of offenses under Article 63, P. C., and sentenced to life imprisonment.

An examination of the indictment reveals that the primary offense was charged to have been committed on September 16, 1939. The two prior convictions alleged were as follows:

1. Felony theft alleged to have been committed on August 30, 1935, which resulted in a conviction in the district court of Jones County on September 16, 1935.

2. Felony theft alleged to have been committed on August 26, 1935, which resulted in a conviction in the district court of Tarrant County on October 28, 1935.

It is apparent therefrom that the Jones County offense was not committed subsequent to the Tarrant County conviction, and therefore, such conviction cannot constitute the basis for prosecution as a third offender under Article 63, P. C. See Square v. State, 142 Tex. Cr. R. 493, 154 S. W. 2d 852, and cases there cited.

It is further apparent therefrom that the indictment is sufficient to charge the relator as a second offender under Article 63, P. C.

The punishment in the instant case, provided for by Article 62, P. C., is ten years.

Relator has served in excess of ten years and is therefore entitled to discharge. Ex parte Pruitt, 139 Tex. Cr. R. 438, 141 S. W. 2d 333.

The writ is granted, and the relator is ordered discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Simmons
422 So. 2d 138 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982)
Ex Parte Ash
514 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Ex Parte Gregg
427 S.W.2d 66 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Harrington v. State
424 S.W.2d 237 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ex parte Sistrunk
349 S.W.2d 728 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Ex Parte Aaron
336 S.W.2d 180 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Puckett v. Ellis
157 F. Supp. 923 (E.D. Texas, 1958)
Ex parte Puckett
301 S.W.2d 649 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 S.W.2d 586, 158 Tex. Crim. 2, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-daniels-texcrimapp-1952.