Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00722-CR
Ex parte Daniel Colunga
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2023-504B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Daniel Colunga, who is charged in the court below with the offense of
possession of a controlled substance, has filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s denial
of his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. The reporter’s record of the hearing on
Colunga’s application and the district court’s docket sheet both reflect that the district court
denied the application. However, the clerk’s record does not contain a signed written order to
that effect.
“A written and signed appealable order is a prerequisite to invoking this Court’s
appellate jurisdiction.” Dewalt v. State, 417 S.W.3d 678, 685 n.32; see Tex. R. App. P.
26.2(a)(1); State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398, 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). In a case where
there has been an oral trial court ruling but no written order has been entered, that jurisdictional
defect is curable: we treat the notice of appeal as prematurely filed, abate the appeal, and remand
the case to the trial court for preparation of an appealable order. Dewalt, 417 S.W.3d at 685 n.32 (citing Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(b); State v. Rollins, 4 S.W.3d 453, 454 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Austin
1999, no pet.)).
Additionally, the clerk’s record does not contain the required trial court
certification of Colunga’s right of appeal concerning the order denying habeas relief. See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (mandating trial court to enter certification of defendant's right of appeal
“each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order”), (d) (requiring record to
include trial court's certification); see also Ex parte Ferrera, No. 03-21-00278-CR, 2021 WL
5457241, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 19, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication) (“An order denying a pretrial application for habeas corpus relief is an appealable
order.”). When the certification is missing from the record, we must direct the trial court to
supplement the record with the certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. See Cortez
v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the district court for
entry of a signed written order on Colunga’s application for writ of habeas corpus and a
certification of his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4(b) (requiring appellate court to
direct trial court to correct remediable error that prevents proper presentation of appeal). A
supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed order and certification shall be prepared and
filed with this Court no later than February 18, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2).
Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump
Abated and Remanded
Filed: February 7, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-daniel-colunga-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.