Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2025
Docket03-24-00722-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00722-CR

Ex parte Daniel Colunga

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2023-504B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Daniel Colunga, who is charged in the court below with the offense of

possession of a controlled substance, has filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s denial

of his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. The reporter’s record of the hearing on

Colunga’s application and the district court’s docket sheet both reflect that the district court

denied the application. However, the clerk’s record does not contain a signed written order to

that effect.

“A written and signed appealable order is a prerequisite to invoking this Court’s

appellate jurisdiction.” Dewalt v. State, 417 S.W.3d 678, 685 n.32; see Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(1); State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398, 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). In a case where

there has been an oral trial court ruling but no written order has been entered, that jurisdictional

defect is curable: we treat the notice of appeal as prematurely filed, abate the appeal, and remand

the case to the trial court for preparation of an appealable order. Dewalt, 417 S.W.3d at 685 n.32 (citing Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(b); State v. Rollins, 4 S.W.3d 453, 454 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Austin

1999, no pet.)).

Additionally, the clerk’s record does not contain the required trial court

certification of Colunga’s right of appeal concerning the order denying habeas relief. See Tex.

R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (mandating trial court to enter certification of defendant's right of appeal

“each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order”), (d) (requiring record to

include trial court's certification); see also Ex parte Ferrera, No. 03-21-00278-CR, 2021 WL

5457241, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 19, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for

publication) (“An order denying a pretrial application for habeas corpus relief is an appealable

order.”). When the certification is missing from the record, we must direct the trial court to

supplement the record with the certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. See Cortez

v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the district court for

entry of a signed written order on Colunga’s application for writ of habeas corpus and a

certification of his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4(b) (requiring appellate court to

direct trial court to correct remediable error that prevents proper presentation of appeal). A

supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed order and certification shall be prepared and

filed with this Court no later than February 18, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2).

Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump

Abated and Remanded

Filed: February 7, 2025

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rollins
4 S.W.3d 453 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
State v. Rosenbaum
818 S.W.2d 398 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Cortez, Damien Hernandez
420 S.W.3d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Suzanne Kearns Dewalt v. State
417 S.W.3d 678 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Daniel Colunga v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-daniel-colunga-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.