Ex Parte Dailey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Dailey

38 So. 3d 738, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 269, 2009 WL 4015640

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 20, 2009·No. 1071413·Published

Opinion

BOLIN, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

COBB, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, PARKER, MURDOCK, and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOLIN, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

COBB, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, PARKER, MURDOCK, and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Dailey, 38 So. 3d 738, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 269, 2009 WL 4015640 (Ala. 2009).

Pincite

38 So. 3d 738 (Ex Parte Dailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related