Ex Parte Custer

1949 OK CR 23, 203 P.2d 889, 88 Okla. Crim. 161, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 2, 1949
DocketNo. A-11149.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1949 OK CR 23 (Ex Parte Custer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Custer, 1949 OK CR 23, 203 P.2d 889, 88 Okla. Crim. 161, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (Okla. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

BRETT, J.

It appearing that heretofore and on December 8, 1948, 88 Okla. Cr. 154, 200 P. 2d 781, this court rendered its opinion in the above styled and numbered matter, wherein it was ordered that the petitioner, Fred Custer, be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Washita county, Oklahoma, pending rendition of judgment in accordance with the provisions of Title 68, O.S.A. 1941 §§ 417, 420. Said order was made and entered for the reason that in pronouncing judgment and sentence the aforesaid provisions of the statutes had not been followed and the petitioner had been sentenced to serve a term in the penitentiary one year in excess of the two years provided by law, and said judgment was therefore void.

It further appears that since the rendition of said opinion the authorities of Washita county have made no *162 effort to execute the order of this court for return of the said Fred Custer, the petitioner, for proper judgment and sentence, and the court is informed the said Washita county authorities do not desire to incur the expense incident to the procedure necessary for the pronouncement of a valid sentence; and it further appearing that in the early part of April, 1949, the petitioner -will have served the maximum of two years as provided by law, and having been prejudiced in his rights as to application for parole, because of said excessive sentence, is entitled to his immediate release under said writ of habeas corpus heretofore granted. The warden of the State Penitentiary should be and is hereby ordered and directed to release the said petitioner from his custody, subject of course to any holds that might be pending against him. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections
614 P.2d 551 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1980)
Homer v. Page
1968 OK CR 82 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1968)
White v. State
1964 OK CR 36 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1949 OK CR 23, 203 P.2d 889, 88 Okla. Crim. 161, 1949 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-custer-oklacrimapp-1949.