Ex parte Curl

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex parte Curl

266 S.W. 1115

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 1924·No. No. 9092·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Erom an order of the trial judge, remanding relator for extradition to the state of Arkansas, this appeal is prosecuted. [1116]*1116The executive warrant from the Governor of this state recites that it has been made known to him by the Governor of the demanding state that relator is under indictment for embezzlement in the latter state, and further recites that a copy of such indictment, properly authenticated, accompanies the demand. We have been unable to discover any irregularity in the proceedings from the record before us upon which relator could legally resist his re-tan to Arkansas. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Erom an order of the trial judge, remanding relator for extradition to the state of Arkansas, this appeal is prosecuted. [1116]*1116The executive warrant from the Governor of this state recites that it has been made known to him by the Governor of the demanding state that relator is under indictment for embezzlement in the latter state, and further recites that a copy of such indictment, properly authenticated, accompanies the demand. We have been unable to discover any irregularity in the proceedings from the record before us upon which relator could legally resist his re-tan to Arkansas. The judgment is affirmed.

Ex parte Curl, 266 S.W. 1115 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

266 S.W. 1115 (Ex parte Curl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.