Ex parte Crumb

2 Johns. Ch. 438
New York Court of Chancery·Decided May 7, 1817·Published

Opinion

The Chancellor.

[ * 440 ]

There is no doubt of a competent power in this Court to discharge or change a guardian appointed by the surrogate. It is done in England, whether the guardian be one at common law, or appointed by last will and testament; but in the. latter case, the Court has required very special reasons for its interference. (In the Matter of Andrews, 1 Johns. Ch. Rep. 99. Spencer v. Earl Chesterfield, Amb. 146. Wyatt, 212. 1 Ves. 160.) Here is no reason assigned why I should discharge this guardian; and, having accepted the trust, he ought not to *be permitted to lay it down when he pleases. I shall require special and sufficient cause for changing or discharging a guardian.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Crumb, 2 Johns. Ch. 438 (N.Y. 1817).

2 Johns. Ch. 438 (Ex parte Crumb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Andrews
1 Johns. Ch. 99 (New York Court of Chancery, 1814)