Ex Parte Crow

101 So. 527, 211 Ala. 613, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 343
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 6, 1924
Docket5 Div. 899.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 So. 527 (Ex Parte Crow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Crow, 101 So. 527, 211 Ala. 613, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 343 (Ala. 1924).

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

We find no erroneous statement of law in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. The inquiries proposed by petitioner would involve questions of fact which this court will not consider on applications for certiorari to the Court of Appeals. On this point Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91, has often been followed.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koonce v. State
165 So. 601 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 527, 211 Ala. 613, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-crow-ala-1924.