Ex Parte Crawford

49 P. 303, 24 Nev. 91
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 1897·No. No. 1509.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Belknap, C. J.:

In the matter of the application of James Crawford for a writ of habeas corpus:

The petitioner is held in custody by the sheriff of Washoe county by virtue of a commitment issued from the court of the justice of the peace of Reno township.

The commitment shows that the petitioner was found guilty of a public offense, to wit, threats against life, and is placed under bonds to keep the peace or be imprisoned in the county jail for the term of six months or until said bond be given.

No objection is made touching the regularity of the commitment, and the jurisdiction of the court is not questioned.

Under these facts it is our duty to deny the application. (Gen. Stats, sec. 3689.)

Whether petitioner was guilty or not, was the question to be decided upon the trial, and if it was erroneously decided, the remedy is by appeal, and not by habeas corpus. (Ex parte Edgington, 10 Nev. 215.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Crawford, 49 P. 303, 24 Nev. 91 (Neb. 1897).

49 P. 303 (Ex Parte Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Jackman
31 Nev. 106 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1909)
Ex parte Kair
28 Nev. 127 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1905)