Ex Parte Craig
This text of 376 So. 2d 807 (Ex Parte Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While we agree with the result of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and therefore decline to issue the writ of certiorari, we cannot agree with all the conclusions of that court and especially where it was stated: "There is evidence that he [Clifford Craig] encouraged or procured, or was instrumental in causing the robbery to be committed."
Other evidence, although circumstantial, was amply sufficient to corroborate the accomplice's testimony as well as tended to connect the defendant with the commission of the robbery.
Writ denied.
TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur. *Page 808
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 So. 2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-craig-ala-1979.