Ex Parte Cox

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Cox

1917 OK CR 89, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 302, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 24, 1917

DocketNo. A-2654.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 89 (Ex Parte Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Cox, 1917 OK CR 89, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 302, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of discharge on bail.

It appears from the petition that upon a preliminary examination before Isaac 0. Lewis, justice of the peace, *303 of Madill, the petitioner, W. G. Cox, was held to the district court of Marshall county to answer upon a charge that he did kill and murder Marion Cox, his son;, that he made application for bail before Jesse M. Hatchett, judge of the district court of Marshall county, at chambers, and the said judge refused to allow bail. It is further averred that petitioner is not guilty of said charge. Attached to said petition is the deposition of the petitioner, wherein he states that in a gun fight with another son, Oliver Cox, the said Oliver Cox fired the fatal shot.

Without entering into a discussion of the evidence, we deem it sufficient to say that upon a careful consideration of the same, we are of opinion that petitioner is not entitled to be admitted to bail as a matter of legal right.

It is therefore considered and adjudged that the writ be denied, and bail refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was an application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of discharge on bail.

It appears from the petition that upon a preliminary examination before Isaac 0. Lewis, justice of the peace, *303 of Madill, the petitioner, W. G. Cox, was held to the district court of Marshall county to answer upon a charge that he did kill and murder Marion Cox, his son;, that he made application for bail before Jesse M. Hatchett, judge of the district court of Marshall county, at chambers, and the said judge refused to allow bail. It is further averred that petitioner is not guilty of said charge. Attached to said petition is the deposition of the petitioner, wherein he states that in a gun fight with another son, Oliver Cox, the said Oliver Cox fired the fatal shot.

Without entering into a discussion of the evidence, we deem it sufficient to say that upon a careful consideration of the same, we are of opinion that petitioner is not entitled to be admitted to bail as a matter of legal right.

It is therefore considered and adjudged that the writ be denied, and bail refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 89, 164 P. 989, 13 Okla. Crim. 302, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-cox-oklacrimapp-1917.