Ex Parte Cota
This text of 110 U.S. 385 (Ex Parte Cota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
4 S.Ct. 25
28 L.Ed. 172
Ex parte COTA.
February 4, 1884.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for respondent.
No brief filed for petitioner.
WAITE, C. J.
It was decided at the last term in Ex parte Tom Tong, 108 U. S. [S. C. 2 SUP. CT. REP. 871,] that this court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the presiding justice or judge. This is such a case, and it is consequently remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 U.S. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-cota-scotus-1884.