Ex parte Coster
7 Cow. 523
Opinion
The question below was upon a mere point of practice, with which we cannot interfere by mandamus. *The C. P. might or might not require these rules to be entered. They were but matter of form, at most, and being omitted, it was in the discretion of the court to allow of the amendment.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Coster, 7 Cow. 523 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
7 Cow. 523 (Ex parte Coster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. Farrar
15 S.E. 117 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1892)
People ex rel. Debenetti v. Clerk of New York Marine Court
3 Abb. Pr. 57 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Judges of Oneida Common Pleas v. People ex rel. Savage
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 325 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1799)