Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ex Parte Conners

Ex Parte Conners

837 So. 2d 326, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163, 2002 WL 1042342
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 24, 2002
Docket1010939
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 837 So. 2d 326 (Ex Parte Conners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Conners, 837 So. 2d 326, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163, 2002 WL 1042342 (Ala. 2002).

Opinion

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyd v. State
913 So. 2d 1113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Ex Parte Deramus
882 So. 2d 878 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Coughlin v. State
837 So. 2d 326 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 326, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163, 2002 WL 1042342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-conners-ala-2002.