Ex Parte Conners

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Conners

837 So. 2d 326, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163, 2002 WL 1042342

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 24, 2002·No. 1010939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Houston, Lyons, Johnstone, and Woodall, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Conners, 837 So. 2d 326, 2002 Ala. LEXIS 163, 2002 WL 1042342 (Ala. 2002).

Pincite

837 So. 2d 326 (Ex Parte Conners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related