Ex Parte Coleman

106 S.E. 572, 115 S.C. 515, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 22, 1921·No. 10593·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice AVatts.

This is the third appeal in this cause. This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Sease, sustaining an order of Probate Judge A¥.' W. Johnson, wherein interest was allowed on attorneys’ fee, due to AVallace & Barron and Geo. S. Mower, Esqs. The exceptions must be sustained. There was no entry and enrollment of the judgment, as the law provides for, so to make it a money judgment. “A decretal order upon which an execution may be taken out is a final decree.” Haskell v. Raoul, 1 McCord, Eq. 32. “It must be a decree upon which an execution could be issued.” Ex parte Farrars in re Garrett v. Dial, 13 S. C. 254.

Exceptions sustained, and order appealed from reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Coleman, 106 S.E. 572, 115 S.C. 515, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 33 (S.C. 1921).

106 S.E. 572 (Ex Parte Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.