Ex Parte Clarence Kirkwood, III
This text of Ex Parte Clarence Kirkwood, III (Ex Parte Clarence Kirkwood, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On April 28, 2006, and May 10, 2006, the trial court denied Clarence Kirkwood, III's applications for writ of habeas corpus without conducting an evidentiary hearing or issuing the writs of habeas corpus. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeals. Kirkwood filed responses in which he concedes that the trial court did not rule on the merits of his applications for writ of habeas corpus.
No appeal lies from the refusal to issue writ of habeas corpus unless the trial court conducts an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the application. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Noe v. State, 646 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). In these cases, the trial court did not address the merits of Kirkwood's petitions. The trial court did not issue writs of habeas corpus, nor did the court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the applications for the writ. Compare Ex parte Silva, 968 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We hold we have no jurisdiction over these appeals. Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeals be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
___________________________
DAVID GAULTNEY
Justice
Opinion Delivered August 9, 2006
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Clarence Kirkwood, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-clarence-kirkwood-iii-texapp-2006.