Ex Parte Christopher Floyd
This text of Ex Parte Christopher Floyd (Ex Parte Christopher Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00463-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER FLOYD
On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s brief. Appellant’s
brief was due on March 22, 2019. Appellant’s brief was received by this Court on April
25, 2019. Upon review of the appellant’s brief, we noted that the brief contains numerous
formal defects and the case has not been properly presented. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9.
On May 7, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief did not
comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4(j)(1), 38.1(c), and 38.1(h). We
requested that appellant’s counsel file an amended brief within five days. More than five days have passed and appellant’s counsel has not filed an amended brief.
Accordingly, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.9(a) and
(b), we STRIKE appellant’s brief and ABATE this matter to allow appellant to redraw the
brief. Appellant is hereby ORDERED to file an amended brief with this Court that
complies with the above rules within fifteen days from the date of this order. In
accordance with Rule 38.1, the facts pertinent to the appeal and the issues and argument
presented in the brief must be clear and concise, and the brief must be supported by
record references.
If appellant files an amended brief that fails to comply with this order of the Court
and the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit
appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See
id. 38.9(a). We are cognizant that appellant’s counsel is representing the appellant on a
pro bono basis, but we must proceed as necessary to protect appellant’s rights on appeal
and to obtain a satisfactory submission of the case. This appeal will be reinstated upon
the expiration of fifteen days from the date of this order, or the date that appellant’s
amended brief is filed, whichever occurs first.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 8th day of July, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Christopher Floyd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-christopher-floyd-texapp-2019.