Ex Parte Choynski

61 S.W. 391, 42 Tex. Crim. 586, 1901 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 20, 1901
DocketNo. 2314.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 61 S.W. 391 (Ex Parte Choynski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Choynski, 61 S.W. 391, 42 Tex. Crim. 586, 1901 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54 (Tex. 1901).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellants were arrested charged with “prize fighting,” and the bond of each fixed at $5000. Being unable to give this bond, they resorted to the writ of habeas corpus, and the district judge, upon hearing the same, reduced the bail to the sum of $2500 each. Appellants claim this amount is excessive, and they are totally unable to give such bond. The record shows their inability to give bond in this amount. The punishment for this offense is not less than two nor more than five years confinement in the penitentiary. It also shows that the grand jury refused to indict appellants for this offense, and so reported to the court; but that body was reinstructed by the court with reference to the matter and the court being still in session indictment may be returned. Under the statute it seems they are not entitled to their discharge in any event until the adjournment of the grand jury for the term. Under the circumstances we believe the amount of the bail fixed by the trial judge is excessive, and amounts to a deprivation of bail, and we therefore fix the amount of the bail at $1000 each; and upon giving bond in this sum, in accordance with the terms of the law, they will be released from custody.

Bail reduced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adaire v. State
60 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Jones v. State
54 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Durbin v. State
36 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Taylor v. State
299 S.W. 402 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Brewer v. State
262 S.W. 765 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
McDougal v. State
194 S.W. 944 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Tuller v. State
126 S.W. 1158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Oates v. State
121 S.W. 870 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Hughes v. State
70 S.W. 746 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 S.W. 391, 42 Tex. Crim. 586, 1901 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-choynski-texcrimapp-1901.