Ex Parte Charles Brice Chapman
This text of Ex Parte Charles Brice Chapman (Ex Parte Charles Brice Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-21-00309-CV
EX PARTE CHARLES BRICE CHAPMAN
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
January 11, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
This original proceeding arises from a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by
Doug Moreland, a non-attorney, purportedly on behalf of Charles Brice Chapman. The
petition seeks habeas relief from an alleged order of contempt issued against Chapman
in a civil case. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d). Without deciding whether
Moreland, a non-attorney, may sign and file said petition for Chapman, or whether a filing
fee is required, we deny the petition as it fails to include the contents required by the
appellate rules and is not accompanied by a record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (requiring
a petition to include, among other things, argument supported by appropriate citations to
legal authorities and the record); 52.7 (requiring a record containing (1) a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was
filed in any underlying proceeding, and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any
relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Charles Brice Chapman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-charles-brice-chapman-texapp-2022.