Ex Parte Centobie

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Centobie

861 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 329156

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 14, 2003·No. 1010462·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing Ex Mero Motu

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. Our denial of the writ should not be construed as approval of the Court of Criminal Appeals' articulation of the cumulative-error rule in Part XVII of the opinion of that court. Centobie v. State, [Ms. CR-98-2056, August 31, 2001] 861 So.2d 1111, 1143-44 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). See Ex parte Bryant, [Ms. 1990901, June 21, 2002] ___ So.2d ___, ___ (Ala. 2002), and Ex parteWoods, 789 So.2d 941, 942 n. 1 (Ala. 2001).

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU; WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing Ex Mero Motu

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. Our denial of the writ should not be construed as approval of the Court of Criminal Appeals' articulation of the cumulative-error rule in Part XVII of the opinion of that court. Centobie v. State, [Ms. CR-98-2056, August 31, 2001] 861 So.2d 1111, 1143-44 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). See Ex parte Bryant, [Ms. 1990901, June 21, 2002] ___ So.2d ___, ___ (Ala. 2002), and Ex parteWoods, 789 So.2d 941, 942 n. 1 (Ala. 2001).

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU; WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Centobie, 861 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 329156 (Ala. 2003).

Pincite

861 So. 2d 1145 (Ex Parte Centobie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related