Ex Parte Centobie

861 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 329156
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 14, 2003
Docket1010462
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 So. 2d 1145 (Ex Parte Centobie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Centobie, 861 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 329156 (Ala. 2003).

Opinion

On Rehearing Ex Mero Motu

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. Our denial of the writ should not be construed as approval of the Court of Criminal Appeals' articulation of the cumulative-error rule in Part XVII of the opinion of that court. Centobie v. State, [Ms. CR-98-2056, August 31, 2001] 861 So.2d 1111, 1143-44 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). See Ex parte Bryant, [Ms. 1990901, June 21, 2002] ___ So.2d ___, ___ (Ala. 2002), and Ex parteWoods, 789 So.2d 941, 942 n. 1 (Ala. 2001).

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU; WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGowan v. State
990 So. 2d 931 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 329156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-centobie-ala-2003.