Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 17, 2025·No. 04-25-00559-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00559-CR

EX PARTE Cecil BURLEY

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED Relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he asks this court to release him from confinement on bond. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se habeas petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC2022CR4667, styled State of Texas v. Cecil Burley, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. State
906 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Gray v. Shipley
877 S.W.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)