Ex parte Causey
This text of 254 S.W.2d 122 (Ex parte Causey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of W. G. Causey for release on habeas corpus following conviction for the sale of whisky in a dry area was presented to the trial court upon much the same facts and legal contentions as found in Ex parte Bronson, No. 25,993, this day decided. (Page 133, this volume). It appears that the conclusions reached by this court will be applicable as well to W. G. Causey's effort to secure release.
However, from an inspection of the judgment found in the transcript, we do not find that Causey’s prayer for release has been denied, and we find no notice of appeal.
In the absence of notice of appeal to this court we are without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss this appeal.
[141]*141The appeal is dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
on appellant’s motion to reinstate appeal.
The record has now been corrected to show that notice of appeal was properly entered.
Accordingly, the motion to reinstate the appeal is granted, and the appeal "is reinstated.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons assigned in Ex parte Bronson, No. 25,933, (page 133, this volume), decided November 5, 1952, which is here controlling.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 S.W.2d 122, 158 Tex. Crim. 140, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-causey-texcrimapp-1952.