Ex Parte Byrd

13 S.W.2d 855, 112 Tex. Crim. 19, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1929·No. No. 10751.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the district court of Nacogdoches County of a felony, to-wit: driving an automobile upon a public road while appellant was intoxicated. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $25.00. There was taxed against appellant as costs the sum of $74.45. He tendered payment of the fine which was refused unless the costs were also paid. A capias pro fine was issued against him and he sought release by habeas corpus proceeding, again tendering in court the $25.00 fine, but contended that under the law he could not be held under a capias pro fine for the costs, but that payment of them could only be enforced under an execution as in civil suits. From an order remanding him to the sheriff this appeal was taken. ■

Appellant’s exact contention was upheld in Ex parte Smith, 8 S. W. (2d) 139. It is not necessary to write further upon the subject. The judgment is reversed and appellant is ordered released upon payment of the $25.00 fine.

Reversed and discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Byrd, 13 S.W.2d 855, 112 Tex. Crim. 19, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199 (Tex. 1929).

13 S.W.2d 855 (Ex Parte Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curry v. Wilson
853 S.W.2d 40 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Pruitt v. State
508 S.W.2d 832 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)