Ex parte Byrd

377 S.E.2d 580, 297 S.C. 540, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 264
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 10, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 377 S.E.2d 580 (Ex parte Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Byrd, 377 S.E.2d 580, 297 S.C. 540, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 264 (S.C. 1989).

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

It appearing from the Petition that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a disability illness as described in the Petition that has been determined to incapacitate her practicing law. By consent of the Respondent and also counsel for the Petitioner, this Court finds that the Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness, and

[541]*541It is therefore ordered that the Respondent, Alice Dillard Potter, be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disabling illness as described in the Petition, for ah indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Potter
417 S.E.2d 875 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 S.E.2d 580, 297 S.C. 540, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-byrd-sc-1989.