Ex parte Byrd

373 S.E.2d 473, 296 S.C. 372, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 153
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 4, 1988·Published

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

It appearing from the Petition that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a physical disability as described in the Petition that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, by consent of the Respondent and also counsel for the Petitioner, this Court finds that the [373] Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness and

It is therefore ordered that the Respondent, Frank Krystofer, Jr., be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Byrd, 373 S.E.2d 473, 296 S.C. 372, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 153 (S.C. 1988).

373 S.E.2d 473 (Ex parte Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.