Ex parte Byrd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ex parte Byrd

373 S.E.2d 473, 296 S.C. 372, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 153

DecidedNovember 4, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 373 S.E.2d 473 (Ex parte Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Byrd, 373 S.E.2d 473, 296 S.C. 372, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 153 (S.C. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

It appearing from the Petition that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a physical disability as described in the Petition that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, by consent of the Respondent and also counsel for the Petitioner, this Court finds that the [373]*373Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness and

It is therefore ordered that the Respondent, Frank Krystofer, Jr., be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONSENT ORDER

It appearing from the Petition that Respondent is a licensed attorney, subject to the jurisdiction of this Court under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure; and it further appearing that Respondent suffers from a physical disability as described in the Petition that has incapacitated him from the practice of law, by consent of the Respondent and also counsel for the Petitioner, this Court finds that the [373]*373Respondent is incapacitated from continuing to practice law due to illness and

It is therefore ordered that the Respondent, Frank Krystofer, Jr., be and hereby is transferred to disability inactive status on the grounds of the disability as described in the Petition, for an indefinite period and until the further Order of this Court.

And it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

373 S.E.2d 473, 296 S.C. 372, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-byrd-sc-1988.