Ex parte Burney

29 Ga. 33
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 Ga. 33 (Ex parte Burney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Burney, 29 Ga. 33 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

— Stephens J.

By the Court.

delivering the opinion

[1.] It is a clear case, that an administrator is not entitled, at least not as a matter of right, to commissions on property [34]*34turned over by him to a distributee, for this case is expressly excepted hom the statute fixing commissions.

[2.] But while we express the .above opinion, we protest against its being drawn into a precedent authorizing this Court to entertain ex parte cases, for the statute organizing the Court, makes no provision for such cases. But as in this case, the effect is the same, whether we affirm the judgment or dismiss the case, we affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitehurst v. Singletary
50 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ga. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-burney-ga-1859.