Ex Parte Bulger

60 Cal. 438, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 489
California Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1882·No. No. 10,755·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Morrison, C. J.:

On the second day of November, 1881, the petitioner, Edward Bulger was convicted in the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco of the crime of “ Battery,” was sentenced by the Court to three years imprisonment in the House of Correction, and now, after having been confined there for six months, applies to be discharged from further punishment under the judgment of the Superior Court. Section 243 of the Penal Code provides that “ battery is [439] punishable by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by both.” The petitioner has been imprisoned for the term of six months and should be discharged.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Bulger, 60 Cal. 438, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 489 (Cal. 1882).

60 Cal. 438 (Ex Parte Bulger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunnicutt v. Frauhiger
158 N.E. 572 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1927)
In Re Bouchard
176 P. 692 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Ex Parte Ellerd
158 S.W. 1145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
State v. District Court of the Third Judicial District
89 P. 63 (Montana Supreme Court, 1907)
In Re Narvaez
89 P. 857 (California Court of Appeal, 1907)
State ex rel. Bone v. Barr
133 Iowa 132 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Perry v. Pernet
74 N.E. 609 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1905)
Ex parte Texidor
8 P.R. 508 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1905)
Ex parte Cox
32 P. 197 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1893)
Ex parte Degener
17 S.W. 1111 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1891)
Cummings v. Conlan
5 P. 796 (California Supreme Court, 1885)