Ex parte Buckhanan

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 360
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1960
DocketNo. 36774
StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 360 (Ex parte Buckhanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Buckhanan, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 360 (Ohio 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged error of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

"Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-buckhanan-ohio-1960.