Ex parte Brown

Supreme Court

Ex parte Brown

271 U.S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 489, 70 L. Ed. 1130, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 10, 1926·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave [646]*646to file petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Peters of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts to allow a direct appeal to this court on a question of jurisdiction, the appeal having been applied for before the effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, denied upon the authority of Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, 358.

Messrs. C. C. McChord and Conrad W. Crooker for petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for leave [646]*646to file petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Peters of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts to allow a direct appeal to this court on a question of jurisdiction, the appeal having been applied for before the effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, denied upon the authority of Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, 358.

Messrs. C. C. McChord and Conrad W. Crooker for petitioner.

Ex parte Brown, 271 U.S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 489, 70 L. Ed. 1130, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659 (1926).

Pincite

271 U.S. 645 (Ex parte Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related