Ex parte Brown

Supreme Court

Ex parte Brown

271 U.S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 489, 70 L. Ed. 1130, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 10, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 271 U.S. 645 (Ex parte Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Brown, 271 U.S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 489, 70 L. Ed. 1130, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659 (1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave [646]*646to file petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Peters of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts to allow a direct appeal to this court on a question of jurisdiction, the appeal having been applied for before the effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, denied upon the authority of Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, 358.

Messrs. C. C. McChord and Conrad W. Crooker for petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for leave [646]*646to file petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Peters of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts to allow a direct appeal to this court on a question of jurisdiction, the appeal having been applied for before the effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, denied upon the authority of Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, 358.

Messrs. C. C. McChord and Conrad W. Crooker for petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 U.S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 489, 70 L. Ed. 1130, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-brown-scotus-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack