Ex Parte Brown and Another

116 U.S. 401
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 18, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 116 U.S. 401 (Ex Parte Brown and Another) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Brown and Another, 116 U.S. 401 (1886).

Opinion

6 S.Ct. 387

116 U.S. 401

29 L.Ed. 676

Ex parte BROWN and another, Petitioners.

Filed January 18, 1886.

J. H. Mitchell, for the motion.

WAITE, C. J.

This motion is denied. According to the petition, the court entertained jurisdiction of the cause, but dismissed it for want of due prosecution; that is to say, because errors had not been assigned in accordance with the rules of practice applicable to the form of the action. This is a judgment which can only be reviewed by writ of error or appeal, as the case may be. Mandamus lies to compel a court to take jurisdiction in a proper case, but not to control its discretion while acting within its jurisdiction. This rule is elementary. Ex parte Morgan, 114 U. S. 174, S. C. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 825, and cases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Morgan
114 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Ex Parte Brown
116 U.S. 401 (Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 U.S. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-brown-and-another-scotus-1886.