Ex parte Broussard

251 U.S. 546, 40 S. Ct. 219, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1084
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 2, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 251 U.S. 546 (Ex parte Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Broussard, 251 U.S. 546, 40 S. Ct. 219, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1084 (1920).

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus herein denied. Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. A. D. IApscomb, for petitioners, in support of the motion. Mr. Horace Chilton in opposition to the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

May v. Town of Mountain Village
969 P.2d 790 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1998)
Colorado Common Cause v. Bledsoe
810 P.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)
Clark v. Town of Estes Park
686 P.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1984)
City of Pueblo v. Weed
570 P.2d 15 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1977)
State v. Latham & York
375 P.2d 788 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1962)
Rank v. Krug
90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. California, 1950)
United States v. Josephson
165 F.2d 82 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Pelley v. Botkin
152 F.2d 12 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)
Taylor v. State
11 So. 2d 663 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
In re Sollars
5 F. Supp. 483 (W.D. Washington, 1932)
Second Nat. Bank of Houston v. Settegast
52 S.W.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Bordelon v. N. O. Terminal Co.
129 So. 452 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Carolina & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Town of Clover
34 F.2d 480 (W.D. South Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 546, 40 S. Ct. 219, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-broussard-scotus-1920.