Ex parte Brooks

7 Cow. 428
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1827
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cow. 428 (Ex parte Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Brooks, 7 Cow. 428 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

This Court

held that the 0. P. were right; no authority in the attorneys being shown. They said, the bond must he executed by the party, or by one of the parties ; and so were the cases of The People v. The Judges of Dutchess, and Ex parte Holbrook, (5 Cowen, 34, 35.) All the parties need not -execute; but some or one of them'must. The statute is express, that the party shall execute; and we have usually construed it with great strictness. We are made to say, in one of the cases cited, that the execution of the bond by a surety was enough ; and that the-party need not execute. We think we must have "been misunderstood by the reporter. At any rate, it was not necessary to go so far in either of those cases; for one or more of the parties had executed regularly. "The dictum, if pronounced, was, therefore, obitei'; and we avail ourselves of this occasion to correct it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-brooks-nysupct-1827.