Ex Parte: Brandon Berry
This text of Ex Parte: Brandon Berry (Ex Parte: Brandon Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-22-00185-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the BRANDON BERRY, § 409th Judicial District Court Appellant. § of El Paso County, Texas
§ (TC#20150D00501)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Brandon Berry, pro se, attempts to appeal the denial of his pre-trial application
for writ of habeas corpus heard by the trial court on September 20, 2022. We dismiss for want of
jurisdiction.
On September 30, 2022, upon receipt of Appellant’s notice of appeal, the Clerk of this
Court issued a letter informing the parties no appealable order was found. Further, the letter gave
notice of our intent to dismiss in ten days for lack of jurisdiction unless any party could show
grounds for continuing the appeal. On October 12, 2022, Appellant filed a response, asserting that
the trial court had verbally denied his pre-trial habeas writ application. Appellant does not provide
the purportedly appealed-from order, nor does he assert in his response that a written order denying the pre-trial writ application has been entered. Appellant nonetheless insists we have jurisdiction
in this case.
A pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus must be denied with a written order to
properly invoke our jurisdiction. State v. Wachtendorf, 475 S.W.3d 895, 903-04 (Tex.Crim.App.
2015). When, as here, there is no written order from which to appeal, the court of appeals lacks
jurisdiction over the appeal. See State v. Sanavongxay, 407 S.W.3d 252, 258-259 (Tex.Crim.App.
2012) (concluding that lack of written order leaves court of appeals without jurisdiction over
appeal); Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1985, no pet.) (court of appeals
has no jurisdiction over appeal absent written judgment or order).
Here, by Appellant’s own admission, there is no written order denying Appellant’s habeas
application but merely a verbal pronouncement of denial by the trial court. Accordingly, we
dismiss Appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Wachtendorf, 475 S.W.3d at 903-04;
Sanavongxay, 407 S.W.3d at 258; Payne v. State, No. 12-17-00143-CR, 2017 WL 2570829, at *1
(Tex.App.--Tyler, June 14, 2017 no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication)
(dismissing appeal from pretrial habeas application for want of jurisdiction absent written order);
Walton v. State, No. 02-18-00396-CR, No. 02-18-00397-CR, No. 02-18-00398-CR, 2018 WL
6424242, at *1 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth Dec. 6, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not
designated for publication) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because appellate court had
not received “a written order from the trial court—a prerequisite to appealability”); Ex parte Wiley,
949 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). All pending motions are denied as moot.
2 JEFF ALLEY, Justice
October 19, 2022
Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte: Brandon Berry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-brandon-berry-texapp-2022.