Ex parte Bozeman

313 S.W.2d 300, 166 Tex. Crim. 270, 1958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4581
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 21, 1958·No. No. 29865·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant sought discharge from custody of police officers of the City of Tulia who, it appears, held him on a capias pro fine issued out of the corporation court. He appeals from an order of the county court entered after hearing remanding him to custody.

The complaint upon which he was tried and convicted was offered in evidence by appellant at the hearing but was excluded. It appears as a part of the bill of exception which certifies that it was the complaint upon which the case against appellant in the corporation court was based.

The complaint is signed but does not appear to have been sworn to.

An unsworn complaint cannot be the basis of criminal prosecution in the corporation court and the judgment rendered thereon is void.

The judgment remanding appellant to custody is reversed and he is ordered discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Bozeman, 313 S.W.2d 300, 166 Tex. Crim. 270, 1958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4581 (Tex. 1958).

313 S.W.2d 300 (Ex parte Bozeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
734 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1978
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1978
Ex Parte Davila
530 S.W.2d 543 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Carter v. State
398 S.W.2d 290 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)