Ex parte Bowling

1 D.C. 39
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1801
StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 39 (Ex parte Bowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Bowling, 1 D.C. 39 (D.D.C. 1801).

Opinion

On an affidavit stating that Joseph Bowling, a constable, had dismissed a peace warrant, and had received for his services $1.62 — The Court suspended him from office, and ordered a rule to be laid on him to show cause why an attachment of contempt should not issue.

Cranch, J.,

contra, because the charge was uncertain and ex parte, — no notice having been given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bowling-dcd-1801.