Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.
564 So. 2d 976, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 120272
Opinion
By denying the petition for writ of certio-rari we do not indicate approval of the language used by the Court of Civil Appeals that suggests a new trial must be ordered only if juror misconduct indicates a “distinct possibility” that the juror reached his decision because of that misconduct. We adhere to the rule articulated in Coots v. Isbell, 552 So.2d 139 (Ala.1989).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co., 564 So. 2d 976, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 120272 (Ala. 1990).
564 So. 2d 976 (Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coots v. Isbell
552 So. 2d 139 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)