Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.

564 So. 2d 976, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 120272
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 8, 1990·No. 89-982·Published

Opinion

SHORES, Justice.

By denying the petition for writ of certio-rari we do not indicate approval of the language used by the Court of Civil Appeals that suggests a new trial must be ordered only if juror misconduct indicates a “distinct possibility” that the juror reached his decision because of that misconduct. We adhere to the rule articulated in Coots v. Isbell, 552 So.2d 139 (Ala.1989).

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co., 564 So. 2d 976, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 120272 (Ala. 1990).

564 So. 2d 976 (Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coots v. Isbell
552 So. 2d 139 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)