Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.
This text of 564 So. 2d 976 (Ex parte Bowen Development & Timber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By denying the petition for writ of certio-rari we do not indicate approval of the language used by the Court of Civil Appeals that suggests a new trial must be ordered only if juror misconduct indicates a “distinct possibility” that the juror reached his decision because of that misconduct. We adhere to the rule articulated in Coots v. Isbell, 552 So.2d 139 (Ala.1989).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 So. 2d 976, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 120272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bowen-development-timber-co-ala-1990.