Ex parte Bostwick

1 Cow. 143
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Curia.

Mandamus will not lie in cases where a remedy may be had by writ of error. Now, it is plain, from the cases cited by the counsel for the defendant, that error will lie where judgment is arrested—not directly and in the first instance—but the party wishing to bring error, should apply to the Court below for judgment against himself. For instance, the plaintiff who applies here should have prayed judgment for the defendant in the Court below. For refusing this, a mandamus would lie. And when the record is put in this form, error may be brought.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Bostwick, 1 Cow. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

1 Cow. 143 (Ex parte Bostwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cortleyou v. Eyck
22 N.J.L. 45 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1849)
Judges of Oneida Common Pleas v. People ex rel. Savage
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 325 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1799)