Ex Parte Bolt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Bolt

428 So. 2d 1371

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 4, 1983

Docket82-335

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 428 So. 2d 1371 (Ex Parte Bolt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Bolt, 428 So. 2d 1371 (Ala. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

By denying the petition for writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as holding that we approve of the conduct by the juror which petitioner claims was prejudicial, but we are of the opinion that the juror's conduct in this case was not such that extraneous facts were introduced upon which the jury might have wrongly been influenced; therefore, petitioner has failed to show probable error in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur. [EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1373-1382 CONTAINED DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS.]

*Page 142

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By denying the petition for writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as holding that we approve of the conduct by the juror which petitioner claims was prejudicial, but we are of the opinion that the juror's conduct in this case was not such that extraneous facts were introduced upon which the jury might have wrongly been influenced; therefore, petitioner has failed to show probable error in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur. [EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1373-1382 CONTAINED DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS.]

*Page 142

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 So. 2d 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bolt-ala-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack