Ex Parte Bollman
This text of 1909 OK CR 89 (Ex Parte Bollman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a petition for writ oí-habeas corpus, presented to this court on behalf of Fred Bollman, who alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty at Chickasha, by M. B. Louthan, sheriff of Grady county, Okla., by virtue of a certain pretended commitment issued by Hon. N. M. Williams, county judge of Grady county, which commitment is biased upon a pretended judgment against petitioner, and that said pretended judgment is null and void, and is of no force and effect, and by reason thereof petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty “without due process of the law,” in violation of the Constitution and laws of the state of Oklahoma.
The record of conviction, judgment, and sentence in this case is the same as in the case of Ex parte Earl Howard, reported in this volume and 103 Pac. 663.
The question presented is identical, and, for the reasons set forth in said opinion, the application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1909 OK CR 89, 103 P. 664, 2 Okla. Crim. 586, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bollman-oklacrimapp-1909.