Ex parte Blumer
This text of 1 Robards 24 (Ex parte Blumer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court, and cited the following [26]*26authorities: Vattel, page 160, sec. 213, 218, 219, p. 160-1-2; Bruce v. Bruce, 2d Bos & Puller, 229, and note; The Venus, 8th Cranch, 279; Story’s Conflict of Laws, sec. 48, 49, 53, &c.; 1st Binney, 350, and note; Ennis v. Smith, 14th Howard, 428; Ex parte Thompson, 1 Wend., 46; Read v. Drake, decided by Judge W. P. Hill, in November, 1864; Remarks of Sec’y Marcy in the Koszta case, in Messages and Pub. Doc., 1854-5, part I, page 40-45; Murray v. The Charming Betsy, 1 & 2 Cranch, 143; Wheaton’s Elements of International Law, 370 and 394 to 405; 1 Black. Com., 366; Kilburn v. Bennett, 13 Metcalf, 20; Thorndike v. City of Boston, 1 Met., 247; 8 Louisiana, 337; 8 Pickering, 476; 5 Greenleaf, 266; Horne v. Horne, 9 Iredell Law R., 108; Leach v. Pillsbury, 15 New Hampshire, 138; Laneuvelle v. Anderson, Eng. Com. L. & Equity R., 22, 641; 2d Maine, 212 and 420, and 354; Putnam v. Johnson, 10 Mass., 499; Green v. Windham, 13 Maine, 228; Ex parte John Luscher, decided at Austin Term, 1864; Bempde v. Johnston, 3 Vesey, p. 202; Hoskins v. Matthews, 35 Eng. Law and Equity R., 532; Johnson v. Beatie, 10 Clark and Fin., 139; Elbers v. United Ins. Co., 16 Johns, 133; Brown v. Smith, 11 Eng. Com. L. and Equity R., 9.
Judgment reversed, and applicant discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Robards 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-blumer-tex-1865.