Ex Parte Blizzard

193 S.E. 633, 185 S.C. 131, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 19
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 26, 1937
Docket14553
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 193 S.E. 633 (Ex Parte Blizzard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Blizzard, 193 S.E. 633, 185 S.C. 131, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 19 (S.C. 1937).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

William Blizzard, a resident of Richland County, died January 22, 1936. Maggie Blizzard made petition to the Court of Probate to be appointed administrator of his estate, alleging that she was his wife. Lizzie Blizzard also applied for letters of administration, alleging that she was the wife of William Blizzard.

The Judge of Probate took the testimony, heard argument of counsel, and made an order holding that neither of the petitioners was entitled to be appointed administrator. He held that Maggie Blizzard was not so entitled for the reason that, when she married William Blizzard, he had a wife then living from whom he had not been divorced, namely, Lizzie Blizzard; that, therefore, his marriage with Maggie was null and void. He held that Lizzie Blizzard was not entitled to the appointment because she had voluntarily left William Blizzard and married another man, thereby forfeiting all interest in the personal estate of William Blizzard, and any right of dower in real estate, if he owned any.

Erom this order Lizzie Blizzard did not appeal, and is out of the case, although for some reason she appears in the record as respondent.

Maggie Blizzard appealed from the order of the Probate Judge to the Court of Common Pleas, which appeal was *137 heard by Judge Greene, who affirmed the order of Probate Judge Smith.

The respondent made a motion to dismiss the appeal, which was heard at the June, 1937, term of this Court; the motion was refused, with leave to renew it at the hearing of the appeal. Strictly speaking, Lizzie Blizzard is no longer a party to this action and has no right to insist upon her motion. The issue is now an academic one, and needs no further attention.

The Court is satisfied with the decree of Judge Greene, and affirms it. It sufficiently states and decides the issues of law and fact; let it be reported.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer and Messrs. Justices Baker and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re The Estate of Jimmy L. Smith
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017
Bell v. Progressive Direct Insurance
757 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2014)
In Re Estate of Duffy
707 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2011)
Callen v. Callen
620 S.E.2d 59 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Tarnowski v. Lieberman
560 S.E.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2002)
Barker v. Baker
499 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)
Cathcart v. Cathcart
414 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
Jennings v. Hurt
160 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Weathers v. Bolt
361 S.E.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)
Lundh v. Fontana
343 S.E.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Mercer Ex Rel. Estate of Mercer v. Bryant
342 S.E.2d 591 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Estate of Stanley v. Sandiford
337 S.E.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
519 F. Supp. 872 (D. South Carolina, 1981)
Payton v. Payton
241 S.E.2d 901 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)
Kirby v. Kirby
241 S.E.2d 415 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)
Estate of O'Neill v. Tuomey Hospital
176 S.E.2d 527 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
State v. Ward
28 S.E.2d 785 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E. 633, 185 S.C. 131, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-blizzard-sc-1937.