Ex parte Blauvelt

166 So. 2d 664, 277 Ala. 1, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 441
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJuly 30, 1964
Docket2 Div. 462
StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 2d 664 (Ex parte Blauvelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Blauvelt, 166 So. 2d 664, 277 Ala. 1, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 441 (Ala. 1964).

Opinion

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

^George E. Blauvelt filed a petition in this Court for writ of mandamus ordering the Jtfdge of the 17th Judicial Circuit, Sumter County, Alabama, to set down and hear a .petition for writ of error coram nobis filed him in the Circuit Court of Sumter County, Alabama, on April 22, 1964.

The petition for writ of mandamus was filed in this Court on June 19, 1964. The Attorney General for the State of Alabama has filed a motion to strike.

The petition for writ of error coram nobis was the second such petition filed by Blauvelt. The first petition for writ of error coram nobis was heard and denied in thg trial court on September 19, 1963, and the petitioner appealed to this Court. The judgment denying the coram nobis petition was affirmed in this Court on June 25, 1964, with a recitation of all the facts in the case. Blauvelt v. State, 166 So.2d 399.1 We see no point in reiterating those facts here. For aught appearing, they are the same in both petitions.

The state’s motion to strike the petition is/due to be, and is, granted.

LAWSON, GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blauvelt v. State
166 So. 2d 399 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 2d 664, 277 Ala. 1, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-blauvelt-ala-1964.