Ex Parte Bitela

452 S.W.2d 501
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 25, 1970
Docket42842
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 452 S.W.2d 501 (Ex Parte Bitela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Bitela, 452 S.W.2d 501 (Tex. 1970).

Opinion

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying bail on appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding.

Appellant was convicted for possessing marijuana; his punishment was assessed at twenty-five years. Appellant contends that his constitutional rights have been violated because the trial court denied bail.

In Ex parte McBride, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 618, 2 S.W.2d 267, the punishment was in excess of fifteen years and bail on appeal was denied. This Court held that Article I, Section 11 of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., which provides that “all prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses, when the proof is evident,” has reference to prisoners before conviction, and that prisoners after conviction are not guaranteed the right to bail.

In Prince v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 559, 336 S.W.2d 140, it was held one who had appealed a conviction after being assessed a penalty,of more than fifteen years had a status equivalent to that of an escapee. 1

This Court recently held in Ex parte Nielssen, 446 S.W.2d 882, that no constitutional right was violated where bail had been denied on appeal where the penalty assessed was in excess of fifteen years. 2

Article 44.04, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides among other things, for bail on appeal, but Section (h) specifically provides that one who has been assessed punishment which exceeds fifteen years is not entitled to bail on appeal.

The relief sought is denied; the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

1

. See Huffman v. Beto, 382 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1967).

2

. For discussion of this rule in Federal procedure see United States v. Piper, D.C., 227 F.Supp. 735. The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari where the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit had held that one convicted in a state court in Illinois had no constitutional right to hail on appeal. Hairston v. Pate, 397 U.S. 971, 90 S.Ct. 1086, 25 L.Ed.2d 265 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. State
897 S.W.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Ex Parte Davis
574 S.W.2d 166 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Ex parte Ballard
525 S.W.2d 23 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Ex Parte Gomez
499 S.W.2d 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Ex Parte Miles
474 S.W.2d 224 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Ex Parte Roberts
468 S.W.2d 410 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 S.W.2d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bitela-texcrimapp-1970.