Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co.

94 So. 837, 208 Ala. 486, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 368
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 30, 1922
Docket6 Div. 705.
StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 837 (Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co., 94 So. 837, 208 Ala. 486, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 368 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Birmingham Iron & Development Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of said court in the case of Birmingham Iron & Development Co. v. Mrs. David Hood, 94 South. 835.

Certiorari denied.

All the Justices concur, except SAYRE, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Birmingham Iron & Development Co. v. Hood
94 So. 835 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 So. 837, 208 Ala. 486, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-birmingham-iron-development-co-ala-1922.