Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co.

94 So. 837, 208 Ala. 486, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 368
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 30, 1922·No. 6 Div. 705.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Birmingham Iron & Development Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of said court in the case of Birmingham Iron & Development Co. v. Mrs. David Hood, 94 South. 835.

Certiorari denied.

All the Justices concur, except SAYRE, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co., 94 So. 837, 208 Ala. 486, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 368 (Ala. 1922).

94 So. 837 (Ex Parte Birmingham Iron & Development Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Birmingham Iron & Development Co. v. Hood
94 So. 835 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)