Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin.

161 So. 3d 1211

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 12, 2014

Docket1130985

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 3d 1211 (Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin., 161 So. 3d 1211 (Ala. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

REL:09/12/2014

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229- 0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TERM, 2014 ____________________

1130985 ____________________

Ex parte Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

(In re: Fairfield Place Homeowners Association, Inc.

v.

Billy E. Pipkin and Sandra T. Pipkin)

(Baldwin Circuit Court, CV-11-901334; Court of Civil Appeals, 2120267)

MOORE, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. 1130985

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this

Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the

language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil

Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.

2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Stuart, Parker, and Wise, JJ., concur.

Shaw, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI