Ex parte Bell

California Supreme Court

Ex parte Bell

34 P. 641, 4 Cal. Unrep. 309, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1082

DecidedOctober 18, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 34 P. 641 (Ex parte Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Bell, 34 P. 641, 4 Cal. Unrep. 309, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1082 (Cal. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner was accused by information of the crime of grand larceny, and, after a trial in the superior court, convicted of petit larceny. His imprisonment in the county jail upon that conviction is alleged to be unlawful, because the superior court has no jurisdiction of petit larceny. [310]*310But the charge of grand larceny gave the superior court jurisdiction, and the statute authorizes a conviction of petit larceny, when grand larceny is charged: Pen. Code, sec. 1159. Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner was accused by information of the crime of grand larceny, and, after a trial in the superior court, convicted of petit larceny. His imprisonment in the county jail upon that conviction is alleged to be unlawful, because the superior court has no jurisdiction of petit larceny. [310]*310But the charge of grand larceny gave the superior court jurisdiction, and the statute authorizes a conviction of petit larceny, when grand larceny is charged: Pen. Code, sec. 1159. Writ denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 P. 641, 4 Cal. Unrep. 309, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bell-cal-1893.