Ex parte Bates

15 S.W. 406, 29 Tex. Ct. App. 138, 1890 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 103
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 1890
DocketNo. 3384
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 S.W. 406 (Ex parte Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Bates, 15 S.W. 406, 29 Tex. Ct. App. 138, 1890 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

WHITE, Presiding Judge.

The relator having been arrested for the murder of one A. E, Frazier, applied to the Hon. James Masterson, judge of the Eleventh Judicial District, for oail under a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, but upon a hearing of the same bail was refused,, and applicant remanded to custody. From the judgment refusing him bail he has prosecuted this appeal.

We have maturely considered the evidence as presented in the record,, in connection with the able argument of counsel, and our conclusion is: that upon the facts appellant is entitled to bail. It is not the practice in this court in granting bail to discuss the facts of the case.

The judgment refusing appellant bail is reversed; and upon his entering into a bond for his appearance to answer an indictment for the murder of said Frazier, in the sum of $5000, with good and sufficient sureties, conditioned as the law directs, the sheriff of Harris County will release him from custody under the mittimus by which he holds him issued by the examining court.

Judgment reversed and appellant admitted to bail in the sum of $5000.

Ordered accordingly.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
385 S.W.2d 260 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.W. 406, 29 Tex. Ct. App. 138, 1890 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bates-texapp-1890.