Ex Parte Bass Mullins

265 S.W. 580, 98 Tex. Crim. 225, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 567
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 22, 1924·No. No. 9058.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Relator was charged by indictment of rape by force and appeals from an order of the district judge refusing to grant him bail.

The prosecutrix, the relator and a number of other witnesses testified.

A recital of the facts is not deemed desirable.. A careful reading of them leads us to the conclusion that proof of a capital offense is not evident. The prosecutrix affirms. and the relator denies the commission of the offense. The testimony of the prosecutrix is in conflict with that of other witnesses upon collateral matters. The report of the alleged offense or outcry was delayed. There is in evidence the admission of the prosecutrix that after the alleged offense she rode in a car with the appellant and consented to be his paramour. This she explains upon the ground of fear of him.

Considering the record in its entirety, we are impressed with the - view that the facts do not reveal a case in which the jury, in the discharge of their duty, would properly assess the death penalty.

The State’s Attorney concedes that bail should be granted.

The judgment denying bail is reversed and bail allowed in the sum. of $7,500.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Bass Mullins, 265 S.W. 580, 98 Tex. Crim. 225, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 567 (Tex. 1924).

265 S.W. 580 (Ex Parte Bass Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Holloway v. Joyner
117 S.W.2d 1 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1938)
Ex Parte King
75 S.W.2d 443 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Ex Parte Hill
293 S.W. 1117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)