Ex Parte Baskin
93 So. 921, 208 Ala. 695
Opinion
Petition of Joel L. Baskin for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of said court in the ease of Joel L. Baskin v. W. O. Taylor, 93 South. 336. 1 , This court approves the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals in this case, under the authority of the cases of Forbes v. Davis, 187 Ala. 71, 65 South. 516, and Bogan v. Hamilton, 90 Ala. 454, 8 South. 186, and the writ is denied. All the Justices concur.
1
18 Ala. App. 462.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Baskin, 93 So. 921, 208 Ala. 695 (Ala. 1922).
93 So. 921 (Ex Parte Baskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baskin v. Taylor
93 So. 336 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Bogan v. Hamilton
90 Ala. 454 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Forbes v. Davis
65 So. 516 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)