Ex Parte Bailey
This text of 1934 OK 666 (Ex Parte Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This original application was filed January 27, 1934, and thereafter on February 27, 1934, a motion to dismiss was filed and the matter taken up by reference. At the hearing before the referee on the motion to dismiss being urged after testimony had been taken, it was mutually agreed by the parties in the proceedings that the same should be sustained, but no order was entered thereon. Thereafter the applicant herein applied to the district court upon the same matters urged in the application for writ of habeas corpus. There being nothing further before this court, and the question having become moot, the motion to dismiss is sustained, the writ denied, and the proceedings dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1934 OK 666, 36 P.2d 3, 169 Okla. 119, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bailey-okla-1934.